no (Chile - 2012)
movie is a brief look at political life under the fascist dictatorship of
Augusto Pinochet in Chile brought into power by a CIA backed coup (similar to
what they did to Iran to get cheap cheap oil at the time despite the poverty of
the people - similar to what satanic "mullah minded sharia law proponent" forces
now siphon off food monies meant for our folks in Iran, being sent into
needlessly and ultimately fruitless ideas of war mongering and arms spending
instead trying to spread disunion and conflict in the region).
Fascist regimes have so far been historically partly a reaction against growing
communist influence and power and to counter this effect to the fullest extent
possible with maximum force employed.
The problem confronting Chile back then was leftist ideology that would have
of economic resources and its allocation focused on the masses with seeming
to the powerful forces already controlling the economy and unwilling to share as
those of extremist leftist leanings would want to see happen - then and now even
- everywhere you look it seems. Communist ideology has friends even today
in the United states leadership roster of recent memory in the person of Senator
Bernie sanders who has made statements that Americans shouldn't really be so
well off until all in Africa it would appear is what he said, have as much or
closely as much to he said in a statement on facebook not too long ago.
Many people were murdered under Pinochet with the full knowledge of those in
power and those supporting them (my own dear bother in law Jose Beltran of Chile
was tortured by these bastards that were personally involved - Jose is a man of
goodness that is godlike in my own honest view I must tell you) So I use my
words with care.
Of course where there is homogeneity of race and culture with no extremes
involved including levels of education and cohesion in a community or country or
even continent, I believe the willingness to share more liberally with ones own
is only a natural instinct which must be seen through to the fullest extent of
what would be practicable and fair and sustainable therefore.
On the other hand where these factors are absent, where there is racial
division, social fragmentation and lack of achievable cohesiveness resulting
from such factors in nature, there will always be seen to be inevitable seeds of
conflict present as none wish to relent in winning for their own sides,
intending on fairness or unfairness, depending on whose side you are ultimately
on, despite what appears superficially I now say, on the surface, to seem the
side one would have expected you to be on as many have fallen away from what
would have been their own community to relate to based on prima facie factors
previously seeming to have had its effect in the minds of such folks previous
to the current era we find ourselves in, I say with care.
Michael Rizzo Chessman